Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 00:59

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What made you stop being an addict?
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Jobs report shifts Fed interest rate forecasts - TheStreet
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What should a young woman do to control sagging breasts?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What was your most memorable combat mission during the Vietnam War?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
The Verge’s guide to Amazon Prime Day 2025: best deals, tips, and tricks - The Verge
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
This is the safest place to hide when a nuclear bomb strikes - The Brighter Side of News
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Kellen Moore: I like where our quarterbacks are heading - NBC Sports